<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intimacy with Godde: summary session 1 &amp; 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capeconversation.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/intimacy-with-godde-summary-session-1-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capeconversation.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/intimacy-with-godde-summary-session-1-2/</link>
	<description>Emergent Expressions of Spirituality in the Cape Town area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nic paton</title>
		<link>http://capeconversation.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/intimacy-with-godde-summary-session-1-2/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>nic paton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 10:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capeconversation.wordpress.com/?p=122#comment-325</guid>
		<description>I do like the tryptich you propose. It helps clarify what we might be looking for in the concept &quot;presence of God.&quot;

I am reminded of 2 other related schemas. 
Joseph Cambell says God presences in 3 places :
- Universe (macrocosm)
- Soul (microcosm)
- Liturgy (mesocosm)

Then there is the classic categories
- Imminance (God is in all things)
- Transcendance (God is wholly other)

The most tricky one is not surprizingly the manifest presence. This involves expectancy, risk, and potential discomfort. But that is after all what all intimacy is about.

Thanks Tim - it&#039;s good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do like the tryptich you propose. It helps clarify what we might be looking for in the concept &#8220;presence of God.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am reminded of 2 other related schemas.<br />
Joseph Cambell says God presences in 3 places :<br />
- Universe (macrocosm)<br />
- Soul (microcosm)<br />
- Liturgy (mesocosm)</p>
<p>Then there is the classic categories<br />
- Imminance (God is in all things)<br />
- Transcendance (God is wholly other)</p>
<p>The most tricky one is not surprizingly the manifest presence. This involves expectancy, risk, and potential discomfort. But that is after all what all intimacy is about.</p>
<p>Thanks Tim &#8211; it&#8217;s good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
